Whether it was something I saw or read I can’t be certain,
but a few weeks ago my memory was jogged about the strange v-cut that Subway formerly
used to create the space for all of your sandwich fixings.
To make the cut ‘sandwich artists’ made a steep angled cut into the bread and carved all around the loaf until the top popped off. Besides its unique shape my recollections of the cut and what it represented were rather akin to my feelings about my sixth birthday party: it was probably fine but truth be told I haven’t really thought about it for a while. Curious about when the shift to a straight cut occurred I indulged in a quick search for the date of the switch. The date was not easy to come by – maybe sometime in the late 90’s or early 2000’s to someone’s best guess – but in my search I was astonished to realize the bees’ nest that had been rattled when Subway changed this cut.
To make the cut ‘sandwich artists’ made a steep angled cut into the bread and carved all around the loaf until the top popped off. Besides its unique shape my recollections of the cut and what it represented were rather akin to my feelings about my sixth birthday party: it was probably fine but truth be told I haven’t really thought about it for a while. Curious about when the shift to a straight cut occurred I indulged in a quick search for the date of the switch. The date was not easy to come by – maybe sometime in the late 90’s or early 2000’s to someone’s best guess – but in my search I was astonished to realize the bees’ nest that had been rattled when Subway changed this cut.
Posts and opinions about the v-cut are plentiful and include
conspiracies, anger over perceived personal offenses, resentment that subway
would not cut their bread in a V even when asked (“That may mean that I am a
petty, bitter little man…but at least I know how I like my sandwiches”), and my
favorite title about “How Subway Went to Shit”. Reasons given by these
impassioned sandwich patriots and their disciples as to why the cut was changed
ranged from the shorter time it took to make only one cut, to the simplicity of
making one cut (obviously not confident in the employee’s cutting prowess), to its
utility in toasting the sub. Lacking the desire to throw my hat in I
nonetheless could not find a satisfactory, or anything even approaching
official, answer that explained the switch. While some of the other answers may
have played a role, I think there’s a better explanation for why subway decided
to depart from the V in favor of the standard cut: Subway needed their
sandwiches to look like sandwiches.




This effect is demonstrated throughout our society whenever
we want something to be considered as part of a certain frame of reference. The
clothes we wear identify us with the characteristics of a certain group, while
any road sign that you see in red will cause you to do a double take because of
the association of red with danger and stopping on the road. Having ‘the look’
has been demonstrated through numerous studies to be one of the most important
factors in the elections of public officials. In one study respondents could
correctly select the winner between two candidates with about 70 percent efficiency, showing that it’s not so much your fitness for office, but rather
whether people think you look like someone who fit the frame of reference for
an elected official.
In the late 1990’s and early 2000’s Subway sought to rebranditself as a healthy fast food chain. To accomplish this they had to create a
frame of reference for their consumers by demonstrating brand parity with other
fast food chains in taste and value, yet conclusively illustrate brand differentiations
in quality and health. In 1997 they launched the 7 sandwiches under 6 grams of
fat campaign, and in 2000 Men’s Health magazine penned a story about soon-to-be
Subway spokesman Jared Fogle who lost 245 pounds in a year by eating Subway sandwiches. Accompanying this were shifts that included a wider fresh bread
selection, and a new slogan inviting you to ‘Eat Fresh’.
Subway needed to ditch the v-cut as a point of parity within
the fresh sandwich shop frame of reference that stood in opposition to the
other fast food retailers like McDonald’s. Therefore, if Subway was to be a
specific type of brand they needed to look like others that were doing the same
thing, and pay attention to social ideas surrounding what their products should
look like. A sandwich with a v-cut is a sandwich in the sense of something
being sandwiched between two pieces of bread, but it is not what consumers
would traditionally call, much less make at home, a sandwich. Thus, like all the other
books in the mystery section or the politician in the strong solid blue tie,
Subway had to change the way they cut their sandwiches for the simple purpose
of making it look like a sandwich. By cutting the sandwich straight across the
product became a sandwich in form, allowing Subway to associate itself with all
the positives sandwiches bring over traditional fast food, while avoiding the
pitfalls of a uniquely Subway sandwich that could differentiate the brand from
the intended frame of reference.
Whether the sandwich ingredients look fresher with the side
cut, the bread toasts better, or the reasoning I provided above, it seems that
Subway has made many of the correct branding choices along their path to becoming
the most numerous fast food chain in the world. Despite this though it will always be difficult to appease those who conclude that you have 'gone to shit'.
Deeper: For discussions on social proof, when we act based on a little bit of evidence that falls into line with how we and others have acted in the past, I highly recommend picking up a copy of Influence by Robert Cialdini or listen to this introductory video featuring Dan Ariely. This article in Psychology Today is a great summary of some of the recent findings in terms of how we view the way people look, especially in terms of their facial characteristics.